The Bank of Namibia (BoN) might lower its economic growth expectations as the country’s export industries continue to suffer under global uncertainties such as the debt crisis, persisting unemployment and the turmoil in North Africa and the Middle East.
“Namibia’s recovery is not consolidating firmly,” BoN Governor Ipumbu Shiimi said yesterday, adding that the bank is busy revising its current forecast of gross domestic product growth of 4,1 per cent for 2011.
The new figure will be announced shortly, he said.
The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the central bank to keep the repo rate unchanged at six per cent for the fifth time in a row. The decision was made to give “the economy some breathing space”, Shiimi said.
He said domestic economic indicators pointed downwards for much of the first half of the year. “The weakest performance was recorded in the primary industry, where the mining sector performed poorly in terms of production and exports, followed by the agricultural sector,” Shiimi said.
Manufacturing and construction fared better, allowing the secondary industry to show a positive growth. However, this was “too marginal to positively affect overall growth,” the Governor said.
“Dismal outturn” in the wholesale and retail sector weigh down the tertiary industry, he said. Linked to this, was the slowdown in private sector credit extension.
According to Shiimi, households are still struggling to recover and paying off the high debt levels.
On the inflation front, Shiimi said price pressures continue to build up, but “remain in the tolerable levels”.
He said the BoN stands ready to adjust its monetary policy in the interest of price stability if conditions demand so.
LINK TO ARTICLE
Copyright © 2011 The Namibian. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
After reading this article, I had some data from the CIA World Factbook:
Source: the Namibia pages of the CIA World Fact Book
agriculture: 16.3%
industry: 22.4%
services: 61.3%
note: statistics are for the formal sector only; about half of Namibia’s people are unemployed while about two-thirds live in rural areas; roughly two-thirds of rural dwellers rely on subsistence agriculture (2008 est.)
51.2% (2008 est.)
country comparison to the world: 193
36.7% (2004 est.)
55.8%
note: the UNDP’s 2005 Human Development Report indicated that 34.9% of the population live on $1 per day and 55.8% live on $2 per day (2005 est.)
QUESTIONS:
Question 1
According to the article economic growth in Namibia in Southern Africa is slowing down. Describe how economic growth is measured.
Economic growth is best measured by changes in real GDP as it gives insight into a country’s real level of output over time. The article, highlights certain industries – mining, agriculture, manufacturing, and construction – and comments on its output over time. By looking at key industries within an economy, a country’s general level or growth of its economy can be understood.
Question 2
Although the Central Bank of Namibia may adjust its growth forecast downwards the rate of economic growth in Namibia may still be positive. To what extent does this indicate that welfare of it population is improving?
Economic growth is measured in terms of real GDP, which is separated from economic development. Economic development looks at the welfare of all people of a country. Simply because there is a increase in real GDP does not necessarily mean the country’s people’s lives are improving. Therefore, a positive rate of economic growth, to a small extent, indicates that the welfare of its population is improving. It is necessary to look at other factors much different than real GDP.
Question 3
Namibia is heavily dependent on the production and export of primary products. Analyse the possible effects of a slowing of growth in the primary industry and agricultural sectors of the economy.
Due to its dependency on the production and export of primary products, a slowing growth in primary products and agricultural sectors of the economy would have significant impact on the real GDP of a country’s economy; however, does not necessarily impact the welfare of the people.
Question 4
Evaluate alternative measures of development that the government of Namibia could target to measure improvements in the welfare of its citizens.
The government of Namibia could target alternative measures such as life expectancy, literacy, population density, number of hospitals, among other measures. When evaluating these alternative measures, it potentially can give a much accurate illustration of the current welfare of its citizen as it gives insight to health, education, life situation, and other indicators of its citizens welfare. Merely looking at real GDP, as discussed earlier, can give a false indication of the economic development (measure of people’s welfare) as an increase in real GDP does not necessarily indicate an increase in quality of life.
Although, these alternatives measures potentially are more accurate, there are possible limitations of this data being subjective and thus incongruent when comparing two countries’ economic development. Furthermore, collecting enough data to accurately measure economic development would take a great deal of time as welfare cannot be easily measured.